Gemini 3.5 Pro remains in testing after reported delay
Bloomberg reported on July 16 that Google's Gemini 3.5 Pro was months behind schedule while the company worked on coding performance. Google said on July 21 that the model was testing with partners and would be broadly available "as soon as it's ready," without giving a date. Teams should keep migration, pricing, and benchmark plans provisional until release and API details are public.
A delay report, not a cancellation
Bloomberg reported on July 16 that Gemini 3.5 Pro was months behind schedule as Google worked to improve its capabilities, particularly coding. 9to5Google's coverage of the report noted that Google had previously pointed to a June arrival and that the company was still testing the model with partners.
Those details come from reporting about Google's internal development process. They do not establish that the model was cancelled, and Google has not published a replacement launch date. Claims about internal training changes or employee concerns should therefore remain attributed to the Bloomberg report rather than presented as confirmed product documentation.
Google's current public position
Google gave a first-party status update on July 21 while announcing Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber. The company said Gemini 3.5 Pro was currently testing with partners and that it planned to make the model broadly available as soon as it was ready. The post did not provide a date, API availability, pricing, or a model card for 3.5 Pro.
Axios separately noted that the July 21 releases did not include 3.5 Pro and connected the omission to Bloomberg's delay report. Together, the sources support a narrow conclusion: a delay was reported, and Google's latest public statement confirms continued testing without committing to a schedule.
What teams should do now
Engineering teams should treat any migration plan as provisional until Google publishes the API surface, availability tiers, pricing, context limits, and safety documentation. Existing production workloads do not need to move merely because a future flagship model has been discussed.
When 3.5 Pro becomes available, compare it on repository-specific coding tasks, tool-use reliability, long-horizon agent workflows, latency under concurrency, and total token cost. Keeping prompts, evaluations, and orchestration portable will make that comparison easier without assuming that an unreleased model will meet a particular quality or cost target.
Key Points
- 1Bloomberg reported on July 16 that Gemini 3.5 Pro was months behind schedule while Google worked on coding performance.
- 2Google said on July 21 that the model remained in partner testing and gave no broad-availability date.
- 3Teams should keep migration, pricing, and benchmark assumptions provisional until release documentation is public.
Scoring Rationale
The reported delay and Google's subsequent partner-testing statement affect evaluation and migration planning for a major model provider. The operational impact is meaningful, but no release date, public API, pricing, or final performance evidence is available.
Sources
Public references used for this report.
Practice with real Ad Tech data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Ad Tech problems

