NEH Operatives Use ChatGPT To Cancel Grants
In recent depositions filed by plaintiffs challenging the National Endowment for the Humanities, former agency operatives Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh admitted using ChatGPT prompts to classify grants as related to DEI and terminated nearly every active NEH grant, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars. Video depositions were later removed by the government; the testimony shows an ad hoc, undocumented process and raises legal and policy concerns about automated decision making.
Key Points
- 1Used ChatGPT prompts to classify grants as 'DEI,' then terminated nearly every active NEH grant
- 2Revealed depositions show ad hoc, undocumented process and operatives unable to define DEI under oath
- 3Suggests policy review, legal exposure, and need for transparent, evidence-based grant evaluation systems
Scoring Rationale
Direct deposition evidence and major policy implications; scope limited to NEH grant cancellations and ongoing legal proceedings.
Sources
Public references used for this report.
Practice interview problems based on real data
1,625 SQL & Python problems across 15 industry datasets — the exact type of data you work with.
Try 250 free problems
