Scoping Review Examines LLMs in Health Communication

A scoping review published in JMIR examines applications, challenges, and future directions of large language models (LLMs) in health care communication. The paper frames effective health care communication as a critical but obstacle-laden area of clinical practice, and synthesizes current evidence on LLM use cases, limitations, and open research questions for practitioners and researchers.
Overview
A scoping review published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) maps the current landscape of large language models (LLMs) applied to health care communication. The review identifies use cases where LLMs are being deployed or studied in clinical and patient-facing communication contexts, documents the challenges practitioners and researchers encounter, and outlines directions for future work.
What the review covers
Health care communication spans a wide range of interactions -- clinician-to-patient explanation, documentation, patient education, care coordination, and clinical training. LLMs have been applied or proposed in multiple of these contexts, though the evidence base remains heterogeneous. A scoping review methodology maps the breadth of published work without requiring quantitative synthesis, making it suited to a rapidly expanding field where studies differ widely in populations, model types, and outcomes measured.
Challenges and limitations
Clinical deployment of LLMs in communication settings raises recurring concerns across the published literature: accuracy and hallucination risk in medical contexts, bias in outputs across demographic groups, regulatory and liability considerations, privacy requirements for patient data, and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks. The review surfaces these as persistent gaps rather than solved problems.
Practitioner takeaway
For teams building or evaluating LLM applications in health care settings, the review provides a structured overview of where work is being done and where evaluation methodology and deployment standards remain underdeveloped. It is most useful as a literature orientation and gap analysis rather than as guidance on specific model choices or deployment architectures.
Key Points
- 1WHAT: Review maps applications, challenges, and future directions for LLMs in clinical communication, covering multiple care interaction types.
- 2WHY: Effective health care communication is crucial but faces persistent obstacles; LLM evidence remains heterogeneous across settings and model types.
- 3SO WHAT: Highlights gaps in evaluation frameworks and deployment standards, useful for teams orienting to the LLM-in-healthcare research landscape.
Scoring Rationale
The review organizes the landscape of LLM applications and challenges in clinical communication, offering practical synthesis rather than new technical advances, which is moderately valuable to practitioners and researchers.
Sources
Primary source and supporting public references used for this report.
Practice with real Health & Insurance data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Health & Insurance problems
