Security & Riskcybersecurityai securityai agentsai developer tools

Radware Adds Agent Security for Claude Code

|July 7, 2026|By LDS Team

5.8

Relevance Score

Radware Adds Agent Security for Claude Code — Photo: d15shllkswkct0.cloudfront.net · rights & takedowns

Radware said on July 7, 2026 that its Agentic AI Protection product now covers developer-hosted agents such as Claude Code, adding compliance reporting and deeper visibility into agent activity. SiliconANGLE reported that the update maps agent interactions and dependencies, governs tool access, and produces audit-ready evidence aligned to ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF. Radware's product page also describes client-side monitoring for Claude Code agents and controls for prompt-injection, jailbreak, and supply-chain risks. For security teams, the practical signal is that agent governance is moving beyond SaaS dashboards into local developer endpoints where source code, credentials, and build tools are exposed.

Developer-hosted coding agents are becoming part of the enterprise control plane, so visibility gaps on laptops and workstations now matter to AI governance. The Radware update is less about one vendor feature than about where agent-security controls are moving: from SaaS-only monitoring toward endpoints where agents can touch source code, secrets, build tools, and internal services.

What happened

SiliconANGLE reported on July 7, 2026 that Radware expanded its Agentic AI Protection product with compliance reporting, deeper visibility into AI agent activity, and protection for developer-hosted agents including Anthropic's Claude Code. The report says the update maps agent activity, interactions, and dependencies, and adds audit-ready reporting aligned to ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.

Technical context

Radware's product page describes monitoring and securing AI agents, including Claude Code agents, on client-side environments. That matters because local coding agents often run with developer context: repository access, shell tools, build systems, tokens, and sometimes production-adjacent credentials. Agent governance that misses the endpoint can undercount the most sensitive tool calls.

For practitioners

The useful evaluation checklist is telemetry coverage, tool-control enforcement, data-loss safeguards, prompt-injection handling, and whether the product exports evidence into existing GRC, SIEM, endpoint, or secure-development workflows. A separate agent-only dashboard is less useful if security teams cannot correlate local agent behavior with identity, device posture, repository access, and incident response.

What to watch

Buyers should look for independent testing, clear deployment boundaries, and integration details rather than only framework alignment claims. The stronger signal will be whether agent-security products can enforce controls without breaking developer workflows or creating another unmanaged endpoint agent.

Key Points

1Radware added coverage for developer-hosted agents such as Claude Code, extending agent security beyond SaaS environments.
2Compliance reporting is framed around ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF evidence needs.
3Practitioners should compare endpoint telemetry, tool-control enforcement, data-loss safeguards, and existing security-stack integrations.

Scoring Rationale

This is a solid security product update because it targets a real governance gap around developer-hosted AI agents and endpoint-level tool access. The impact is meaningful for enterprise security teams, but it remains a vendor-specific release rather than a broad market or regulatory milestone.

MoreCybersecurity news