Author Assesses the Value of Work Amid Automation
In a 2020 blog post on Incolumitas, the author examines the consequences of rapid automation and computerization for human work. The post proposes a working definition of work as activity that pays the bills, produces value for the recipient, and whose pay generally correlates with produced value. The author raises the possibility that automation could leave some people not producing marketable value and argues that, within a welfare state, work should be voluntary so that basic needs like housing, food, and healthcare are guaranteed. The essay is written from the perspective of a software engineer and frames these claims as normative recommendations rather than empirical findings.
What happened
The 2020 Incolumitas blog post "The value of work in the coming decades" analyzes likely social effects of accelerating automation and computerization. The piece sets out a three-part definition of work: it "pays the bills," it "produces value for the recipient of effort," and the money earned usually correlates with produced value. The author discusses scenarios where automation reduces the number of people producing marketable value and, in response, argues that work should be voluntary inside a welfare state that guarantees essentials such as housing, food, and healthcare. The essay is presented from the author's viewpoint as a software engineer.
Editorial analysis - technical context
Industry-pattern observations: debates about automation and work commonly distinguish routine, automatable tasks from creative and social tasks. For practitioners, that classification matters because automation technologies preferentially replace repeatable, well-specified processes while amplifying demand for oversight, integration, and domain expertise. The blog's framing-defining work in terms of value transfer and income-aligns with economic analyses used to map task-level automation risk, but it is a normative argument rather than an empirical study.
Context and significance
For policymakers and ML practitioners, the key tension is how productivity gains from automation translate into distributional outcomes. Editorial analysis: conversations about voluntary work and expanded welfare provisions are part of a broader policy toolkit that includes universal basic income, negative income tax, and targeted retraining. These policy options influence adoption incentives, cost-benefit calculations for automation, and workforce planning across sectors.
What to watch
Industry observers should monitor labor-market indicators (task-level employment shifts, wage polarization), legislative movement on guaranteed income or welfare expansion, and public-sector pilots testing basic provisioning. Changes in these signals will shape the social context in which automation technologies are developed and deployed.
Scoring Rationale
This is a normative essay that offers useful conceptual framing for debates about automation and welfare, but it is not new empirical research or a frontline policy announcement. Its direct operational impact for ML practitioners is modest. The piece dates from 2020, which reduces immediacy and lowers the practical impact.
Practice interview problems based on real data
1,500+ SQL & Python problems across 15 industry datasets — the exact type of data you work with.
Try 250 free problems
