More Than 1,100 AI Lab Employees Ask U.S. to Develop AI-Pacing Tools
A July statement signed by 1,122 employees of frontier AI companies asks the U.S. government to support an international effort to develop technical and governance tools for deliberately pacing automated AI development. The signatories include staff and founders from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Mistral and Thinking Machines, but the statement represents individual signers rather than formal corporate endorsements.
A public statement signed by 1,122 employees of frontier AI companies asks the U.S. government to support an international effort to develop technical and governance tools for deliberately pacing automated AI development.
The July statement, titled "Pacing the Frontier," argues that advanced AI could produce major benefits but that companies and countries face competitive pressure not to slow development unilaterally. It asks for coordinated capacity that could give industry, government and society time to address emerging risks, strengthen oversight and build security measures.
Who signed it
The live signatory list includes employees, researchers, founders and executives associated with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Mistral and Thinking Machines. Prominent names shown on the originating site include Thinking Machines chief scientist John Schulman, OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki, Anthropic co-founder Jared Kaplan, Meta chief scientist Shengjia Zhao and Google DeepMind chief scientist Jeff Dean.
The affiliation list is important context, but it is not the same as a corporate policy statement from those employers. The originating page presents the document as a statement from employees, and The Verge likewise reports it as an employee-led effort. The current count can also change as additional people sign.
What the request would do
The statement does not announce a moratorium, a binding slowdown or a finished regulatory framework. It asks the U.S. government to help develop the technical and governance infrastructure that could make coordinated pacing possible if risks require it.
For AI practitioners, the concrete implication is not an immediate change to model access or release schedules. It is a push to treat monitoring, evaluation, release controls and international coordination as infrastructure that should be designed before a crisis forces an improvised response. Whether governments and labs can define measurable thresholds, verification methods and legitimate decision authority remains unresolved.
Key Points
- 1The originating page displayed 1,122 signatories when retrieved on July 28.
- 2The statement asks the U.S. government to support international work on technical and governance tools for pacing automated AI development.
- 3Signers are affiliated with major AI labs, but the statement is employee-led rather than a formal endorsement by every named company.
- 4The proposal does not itself impose a slowdown or establish binding release rules.
Scoring Rationale
The statement shows unusually broad employee-level support across frontier labs for coordinated governance capacity. It is policy-relevant but remains a nonbinding request without an adopted framework, enforceable thresholds or demonstrated government action.
Sources
Primary source and supporting public references used for this report.
Practice with real Ad Tech data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Ad Tech problems
