Insurers Adopt AI for Claims and Sales, Risks Rise

Dig-in reports that artificial intelligence is accelerating in insurance sales, underwriting and claims administration. The article cites a JD Power finding that auto insurance shoppers averaged 3.5 quotes each in the 2026 U.S. Insurance Shopping Study and that digital purchases rose from 36% in 2021 to 48% of policies bought online today. Dig-in also reports that 90% of senior U.K. and European insurance professionals - per an EIP/Censuswide survey - expect AI to manage end-to-end claims administration within 24 months (EIP director David Mitchell-Dawson puts the average expectation at 15 months). Regulators require explainable, auditable decisions. The piece highlights rising use of continuous monitoring for property risk, noting U.S. water damage costs near $13 billion annually and average claims above $15,000. Firms are advised to retain human oversight in underwriting and claims decisions to preserve auditability and limit liability.
What happened
Dig-in reports that artificial intelligence is reshaping how consumers shop for policies, how carriers price products and how claims are handled. Per Dig-in, JD Power's 2026 U.S. Insurance Shopping Study found auto shoppers averaged 3.5 quotes - the highest level in the study's 20-year history - and that digital purchases rose from 36% five years ago to 48% of policies bought online today. JD Power managing director Stephen Crewdson attributed the trend to mobile apps and AI tools making it easier to compare and understand options. A separate EIP/Censuswide survey of 250 senior U.K. and European insurance professionals found 90% expect claims administration to be managed end-to-end by AI within 24 months; EIP director David Mitchell-Dawson noted the average expectation among respondents is 15 months. The article cites U.S. water damage figures of roughly $13 billion in annual insurer costs and average claims above $15,000 to motivate continuous underwriting approaches.
Regulatory and governance context
EIP and Dig-in both note that claims decisions must be consistent, transparent, and auditable - requirements that constrain pure probabilistic AI systems. The EIP survey found 99% of professionals believe some level of human oversight must accompany AI-driven outcomes, and 87% are concerned about bias. Only 10% of respondents ranked cost as a strong procurement factor, signaling that governance, integration, and auditability weigh more heavily than headline price when evaluating AI tools for insurance operations.
What to watch
For practitioners: track regulatory guidance on auditability, vendor governance frameworks, and standards for sensor telemetry. Also watch operational controls that preserve human review in high-risk decisions and engineering patterns needed to produce reproducible decision logs for both model and rules-based components.
Scoring Rationale
Dig-in synthesis combining verified JD Power and EIP survey data on AI adoption in insurance sales and claims. Key stats independently confirmed: 48% digital purchase rate, 90% expecting end-to-end claims AI within 24 months (avg 15 months). Trade-publication roundup rather than primary research or a product announcement; solid vertical relevance for insurance-sector practitioners but not a major industry development.
Practice with real Health & Insurance data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Health & Insurance problems


