GPT-5 Outperforms Judges in Rule Application

University of Chicago law professors Eric Posner and Shivam Saran report in a 2025 paper that GPT-5 applied applicable state-law rules correctly in their replication study of federal-judge decisions. The researchers found GPT-5 (and Google Gemini 3 Pro) reached legally correct outcomes in 100 percent of tested car-accident choice-of-law scenarios, compared with judges' 52 percent compliance. The result raises questions about delegating consequential judicial decisions to rule-bound models.
Scoring Rationale
Strong empirical evidence of LLM legal formalism; limited by narrow case scenarios and unresolved normative implications.
Practice with real Logistics & Shipping data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Logistics & Shipping problemsStep-by-step roadmaps from zero to job-ready — curated courses, salary data, and the exact learning order that gets you hired.
Sources
- Read OriginalGPT-5 bests human judges in legal smack downtheregister.com

