Canadian VCs Clash Over AI Valuations

At a Toronto conference panel moderated by BetaKit reporter Josh Scott, Canadian venture capitalists Udit Bhatnagar (McRock Capital), Neha Khera (IRV Fund) and Zeeshan Ali (Wittington Ventures) debated whether the current AI market is a bubble, while converging on a single point: valuation math does not add up, according to BetaKit. Bhatnagar said, "I think the math is not mathing at this moment," arguing that round sizes are growing even though AI promises lower development cost. Khera said, "I think we're in a huge bubble, and I think it's going to burst very soon," citing broad market reliance on AI-linked stocks and missed metrics at large AI players, as reported by BetaKit. Ali agreed some deals are priced "extremely" but said there is "tremendous room to grow," per BetaKit. BetaKit also noted increased cloud spending by Google, Microsoft and Amazon as part of the public discussion.
What happened
At a conference in Toronto, a panel moderated by BetaKit reporter Josh Scott brought together three Canadian venture capitalists: Udit Bhatnagar (McRock Capital), Neha Khera (IRV Fund) and Zeeshan Ali (Wittington Ventures), who disagreed on whether the current AI market is a bubble but agreed valuation math looked inconsistent, according to BetaKit. Bhatnagar said, "I think the math is not mathing at this moment," noting larger round sizes despite expectations that AI could lower build costs. Khera said, "I think we're in a huge bubble, and I think it's going to burst very soon," and referenced broad market exposure to AI-linked stocks and missed targets at some large AI companies, as reported by BetaKit. Ali told the panel that some AI investments are priced "extremely" but that he sees "tremendous room to grow," per BetaKit.
Technical details
BetaKit reported panel discussion points rather than new technical disclosures. Panelists discussed how outsized late-stage rounds, including those for major AI players, affect early-stage valuation benchmarks and fundraising comparisons. BetaKit also noted increased spending by Google, Microsoft, and Amazon in their cloud-computing businesses during the same period, as part of the context the panel referenced.
Industry context
Editorial analysis: Companies that receive very large late-stage financing rounds tend to shift comparables and benchmarks across a sector, which can inflate expectations for early-stage startups. For practitioners, inflated benchmarks raise the bar for fundraising and can change due-diligence focus toward unit economics and repeatable revenue generation rather than purely growth or product novelty. Investors and founders in AI-heavy sectors often contend with higher compute and infrastructure cost lines, which complicate near-term profitability measures.
What to watch
For observers and practitioners, indicators to monitor include: - changes in median round sizes and pre-money valuations for AI startups, - profitability and margin signals from large foundation-model companies, - continued capital commitments to cloud and compute by major providers, and - whether investor diligence increasingly emphasizes customer-level economics over model-capability demos. These signals will help clarify whether current pricing reflects lasting value or short-term exuberance.
Scoring Rationale
The piece highlights shifts in investor sentiment and benchmarking that affect fundraising and diligence in AI startups. It is notable for practitioners tracking valuations and capital flows but is regionally focused and based on a panel discussion rather than new market-wide data.
Practice with real Ad Tech data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Ad Tech problems

