AI Reassesses Need for a Sense of Smell

Philip Maughan argues that recent headlines claiming AI can 'smell' overstate progress. Current systems, including large language models, only mirror human associations about odors from training data rather than sensing volatile chemicals. True olfaction requires dedicated sensors, labeled chemical data, and cross-modal grounding that most AI research ignores. The essay calls attention to the gap between sensational coverage and the practical engineering and scientific work needed to build reliable artificial olfaction systems. For practitioners, the takeaway is that olfaction is a hard, underfunded multimodal problem with clear applications in healthcare, food safety, and environmental monitoring, but it demands hardware, chemistry knowledge, and domain-specific datasets rather than more scale-only LLM training.
What happened
Philip Maughan, writing in Noema Magazine, pushes back against breathless headlines that claim AI can now 'smell.' He notes that many stories conflate pattern recognition in language models with genuine olfactory sensing. The most dramatic claims come from media summaries, while careful reading of outlets like BBC Future shows the underlying behavior is an LLM repeating human associations about colors, shapes, and tastes captured in text corpora, not detecting volatile compounds.
Technical details
The gap between perceived and actual progress is structural. Current systems that appear to 'smell' fall into two categories: multimodal models trained on correlational text-image or text-audio data, and prototype sensor stacks called 'electronic noses' that read chemical signatures. Neither is yet close to human olfaction in reliability or generality. Key technical pain points include:
- •sparse, noisy ground truth: labeled smell datasets are tiny and subjective, complicating supervised learning
- •sensor variability: chemical sensor arrays exhibit drift, cross-sensitivity, and require calibration
- •representation gap: mapping molecular structure and concentration to perceptual labels needs physics-aware features and chemoinformatics
Practitioners should note that LLM behavior alone is not evidence of olfactory capability. Building practical olfaction requires integrating hardware (sensor arrays, gas chromatography), domain models from chemistry, and multimodal training pipelines that handle temporal drift and environmental confounders.
Context and significance
This matters because olfaction unlocks high-value applications: early disease biomarkers in breath analysis, spoilage and contamination detection in food supply chains, and industrial safety monitoring for toxic leaks. The field sits at the intersection of AI, analytical chemistry, and instrumentation, so progress depends less on scaling transformer parameter counts and more on cross-disciplinary datasets, robust sensor platforms, and realistic field trials.
What to watch
Track work that combines calibrated sensor hardware with principled molecular representations, reproducible field datasets, and benchmarking protocols for drift and cross-environment generalization. Funding and collaborations that bridge chemistry and ML will determine whether artificial olfaction moves beyond appealing headlines into reliable products.
Scoring Rationale
The essay highlights an important but underexplored modality with clear application value. It is not a new technical breakthrough, so its importance is notable rather than industry-shaking. Freshness of the piece reduces the raw score slightly.
Practice interview problems based on real data
1,500+ SQL & Python problems across 15 industry datasets — the exact type of data you work with.
Try 250 free problemsStep-by-step roadmaps from zero to job-ready — curated courses, salary data, and the exact learning order that gets you hired.


