Analysispeer reviewscholarly publishingresearch integrity
Academic Journals Face Worsening Peer-Review Crisis
6.3
A study of Australian academic journals surveyed 139 editors and interviewed 27, finding 55% say finding peer reviewers is a significant or very significant challenge. Editors report sending 30-plus invitations for two reviewers, increased desk rejections, longer publication delays, and growing fears for journal viability and research integrity; authors and institutions are urged to formally recognise and incentivise reviewing.
Key Points
- 1Report shows 55% of editors rate finding reviewers as significant or very significant challenge
- 2Journal viability and research integrity suffer as papers are delayed, rejected, or unreviewed
- 3Practitioners should expect longer publication timelines and increased reliance on editorial triage and AI screening
Scoring Rationale
Solid national survey with interviews supports urgency, but study is single-country and offers limited actionable implementation pathways
Sources
Public references used for this report.
Practice with real Ride-Hailing data
90 SQL & Python problems · 15 industry datasets
Used by DS/ML engineers at top companies
250 free problems · No credit card
See all Ride-Hailing problems
