Skip to content
LDS history archive · AI-001Source-led research edition

The history of artificial intelligence How intelligence became a machine problem.

Follow the programs, laboratories, arguments, failures, and public demonstrations that kept changing what artificial intelligence meant.

Every record is tied to a primary or archival record, from original papers and books to technical reports, system documentation, official releases, and legal texts. Disputed firsts and later retellings are labeled.

Browse the sources

Archive navigator

Follow the evidence behind each turning point.

Drag or use arrow keys
01 / 52A neural model becomes a logical machine
52 researched records94 research sources6 eras19432025 research span
Published
Last updated
Research and curation
Let's Data Science

The researched chronology

Intelligence kept changing its definition.

Artificial intelligence did not advance along one technical path. Logic, search, language, robotics, probability, learning, and control rose, stalled, and combined at different times. Each record shows what was actually built, how it was tested, and where later retellings became too neat.

  1. Record 01 · Neural computation and logicDecember 1943

    A neural model becomes a logical machine

    What changed

    McCulloch and Pitts described idealized all-or-none neurons as logical elements and showed how networks of them could represent propositions that unfold over time.

    Why it lasted

    The paper made a biological question available to mathematical analysis and gave later AI researchers a formal model of computation built from neuron-like units.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A neuron could stand for a logical operation.

  2. Record 02 · Cybernetics and control

    Cybernetics makes feedback a theory of control

    What changed

    Wiener treated organisms and machines as systems that sense outcomes, communicate information, and correct their behavior through feedback.

    Why it lasted

    Cybernetics offered an embodied account of intelligent behavior that developed alongside, and sometimes in tension with, symbolic AI.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Action returned as information.

  3. Record 03 · Game searchMarch 1950

    Shannon turns chess into a search problem

    What changed

    Shannon described how a computer could explore a game tree, stop before exhaustive search became impossible, and evaluate the positions it reached.

    Why it lasted

    Search plus a hand-built evaluation function became one of AI's most durable engineering patterns, from early chess programs to Deep Blue.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A vast game became a pruned tree.

  4. Record 04 · Machine intelligenceOctober 1950

    Turing replaces a definition with a test

    What changed

    Turing proposed the imitation game as a way to discuss thinking machines through observable conversation, then examined objections, learning, and the education of a child machine.

    Why it lasted

    The paper shifted debate from an elusive definition of thought toward behavior that people could inspect and challenge.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Intelligence became an encounter with an evaluator.

  5. Record 05 · Field formationProposal: August 1955 · workshop: summer 1956

    Artificial intelligence receives a name

    What changed

    The Dartmouth proposal grouped language, abstraction, problem solving, neural networks, and self-improvement under the name artificial intelligence.

    Why it lasted

    It gave a loose collection of research programs a shared identity, an ambitious agenda, and a place to argue about what intelligence required.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Several research programs entered one field.

  6. Record 06 · Automated reasoningProgram: 1956 · paper: September 1956

    Logic Theorist searches for proofs

    What changed

    Logic Theorist represented proofs as a search among symbolic expressions and used heuristics to avoid exploring every possible derivation.

    Why it lasted

    It showed a running computer program performing a task associated with mathematical reasoning and made heuristic search central to early AI.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Heuristics chose which proof paths deserved attention.

  7. Record 07 · AI programming languagesDevelopment: 1958 · paper: April 1960

    LISP gives symbolic AI a working language

    What changed

    LISP represented programs and symbolic expressions with the same list structures, supporting recursion, dynamic experimentation, and programs that manipulate other programs.

    Why it lasted

    Its fit with symbolic computation made LISP the main working language of many AI laboratories for decades.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Knowledge and programs shared one representation.

  8. Record 08 · Knowledge representationPresented: November 24–27, 1958 · published: 1959

    The Advice Taker proposes knowledge in logic

    What changed

    McCarthy proposed a system that would accept declarative statements about the world, draw consequences from them, and improve its behavior when given new facts.

    Why it lasted

    The paper placed explicit knowledge representation and common-sense reasoning near the center of symbolic AI.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Facts became material for inference.

  9. Record 09 · General problem solvingJune 1959

    GPS searches for a general problem-solving pattern

    What changed

    General Problem Solver compared a current state with a goal, selected an operator that might reduce the difference, and created subgoals when that operator could not yet be used.

    Why it lasted

    Means-ends analysis became a durable account of planning and a serious attempt to separate a problem-solving strategy from any one puzzle.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A difference between state and goal created the next subproblem.

  10. Record 10 · Industrial robotics

    Unimate brings programmed action to a factory

    What changed

    A Unimate arm entered service at a General Motors plant, replaying stored motions to handle hot die-cast parts in a dangerous industrial setting.

    Why it lasted

    It moved programmable machines from laboratory discussion into repeatable physical work and helped establish industrial robotics as a field and business.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Stored instructions became physical action.

  11. Record 11 · Scientific expert systemsProject begins: 1965

    DENDRAL makes expert knowledge computational

    What changed

    DENDRAL generated and tested candidate molecular structures by combining chemical constraints, mass-spectrometry evidence, and rules supplied by specialists.

    Why it lasted

    The project showed that deep, carefully encoded domain knowledge could outperform a shallow claim to generality on a real scientific task.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Specialized knowledge narrowed the search.

  12. Record 12 · Automated theorem provingJanuary 1965

    Resolution gives theorem proving one inference rule

    What changed

    Robinson joined resolution with a practical unification procedure, allowing a program to prove first-order statements by deriving a contradiction from their negation.

    Why it lasted

    The method gave automated reasoning a compact logical foundation and influenced theorem provers, deductive databases, and logic programming.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Unification made one proof rule widely reusable.

  13. Record 13 · Dialogue systemsJanuary 1966

    ELIZA reveals how readily people infer understanding

    What changed

    ELIZA transformed typed input with scripts and pattern-matching rules. Its DOCTOR script reflected statements back in the style of a nondirective therapist.

    Why it lasted

    The program became an early lesson in human-computer interaction: a sparse conversational mechanism could invite users to attribute far more understanding than it possessed.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A pattern match became a social cue.

  14. Record 14 · Machine translation policyNovember 1966

    The ALPAC report challenges machine translation claims

    What changed

    The ALPAC committee found no immediate prospect that general-purpose machine translation would compete with human translation and called for stronger evaluation and basic research.

    Why it lasted

    Its recommendations sharply changed US support for machine translation and made evaluation, cost, and real demand unavoidable parts of the technical story.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A public review compared promises with measured utility.

  15. Record 15 · Mobile roboticsProject: 1966–1972

    Shakey connects perception, planning, and action

    What changed

    Shakey combined camera input, a model of its surroundings, route finding, logical planning, and low-level actions in one mobile robot system.

    Why it lasted

    The project forced separate AI techniques to work together in a physical environment and produced influential methods in search, planning, and computer vision.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A plan had to survive contact with a room.

  16. Record 16 · Heuristic searchJuly 1968

    A* balances path cost with heuristic guidance

    What changed

    A* ranked possible paths by combining the cost already paid with a heuristic estimate of the cost still required to reach the goal.

    Why it lasted

    The algorithm exposed a precise tradeoff between problem knowledge and search effort, and it became foundational in planning, robotics, routing, and games.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A useful estimate decided which path to inspect next.

  17. Record 17 · Natural language and reasoningSystem: 1968–1970 · report: February 1971

    SHRDLU links language and action inside a miniature world

    What changed

    SHRDLU accepted instructions and questions about a simulated blocks world while sharing one representation across parsing, dialogue, deduction, planning, and action.

    Why it lasted

    It showed how coherent language behavior could emerge when every object, relation, and possible action belonged to a small, fully specified world.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Language and action met inside one world model.

  18. Record 18 · Automated planning

    STRIPS turns planning into state change

    What changed

    STRIPS represented actions through conditions and effects, then searched for a sequence of actions that transformed an initial world state into a goal state.

    Why it lasted

    Its compact planning language shaped decades of work on automated planning and remains visible in later planning formalisms.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Each action rewrote a small part of the world.

  19. Record 19 · Medical expert systemsProject begins: spring 1972 · dissertation completed: October 1975 · book: 1976

    MYCIN joins rules, confidence, and explanation

    What changed

    MYCIN used backward-chained rules to recommend antimicrobial treatments, attached certainty factors to uncertain conclusions, and could explain parts of its reasoning.

    Why it lasted

    Its architecture influenced expert-system shells, knowledge acquisition, rule-based explanation, and the design of later decision-support systems.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Rules carried both a conclusion and a degree of confidence.

  20. Record 20 · Logic programmingFirst system: late 1972

    Prolog turns logic into a programming practice

    What changed

    The Marseille team built a language in which facts and rules could be executed through unification and proof search, drawing on theory developed through collaboration with Kowalski.

    Why it lasted

    Prolog became a major language for symbolic AI, natural-language processing, theorem proving, expert systems, and computer-science education.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A logical statement could also direct a computation.

  21. Record 21 · Research policy and evaluationReport completed: July 1972 · published: 1973 · BBC broadcast: June 1973

    The Lighthill report tests AI against scale

    What changed

    Lighthill argued that many general AI claims had not survived combinatorial growth and the complexity of real environments. The review contributed to a harsher funding climate in Britain.

    Why it lasted

    The report made scaling, evaluation, and the gap between a controlled demonstration and a dependable system central policy questions.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A funding review asked whether the demonstrations could scale.

  22. Record 22 · Knowledge representationJune 1974

    Frames organize what a system expects

    What changed

    Minsky proposed structured frames whose slots could hold expected participants, default values, procedures, and links to related situations.

    Why it lasted

    The proposal influenced knowledge-representation languages, schema theories, semantic networks, object-centered models, and later ontology work.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A situation arrived with expectations and empty slots.

  23. Record 23 · Commercial expert systemsDevelopment: 1978 · regular use: 1980

    XCON takes expert rules into production

    What changed

    R1, later called XCON, configured VAX computer orders by applying production rules elicited from Digital Equipment Corporation specialists.

    Why it lasted

    Its practical value gave expert systems a persuasive commercial success and helped drive corporate investment in knowledge engineering.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Factory expertise became a maintained rule base.

  24. Record 24 · National AI strategy

    Japan makes knowledge computing an industrial project

    What changed

    Japan's Fifth Generation Computer Systems project pursued parallel machines built around logic programming and knowledge processing rather than conventional sequential computing.

    Why it lasted

    The effort turned AI into industrial policy and prompted strategic computing programs in Britain, the United States, and Europe.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A research agenda became national infrastructure.

  25. Record 25 · Common-sense knowledgeProject begins: 1984 · first account: 1985

    Cyc attempts to encode common sense at scale

    What changed

    Cyc began as a long-term effort to hand-encode the ordinary facts, categories, exceptions, and contexts that specialized programs usually leave unstated.

    Why it lasted

    The project made the scale of common-sense knowledge visible and turned brittleness and knowledge acquisition into explicit engineering problems.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Everyday assumptions became entries in a knowledge base.

  26. Record 26 · Behavior-based roboticsMemo: September 1985 · paper: March 1986

    Subsumption removes the central planner

    What changed

    Brooks organized robot control as interacting layers of behavior. Higher layers could suppress or redirect lower-level outputs without relying on one complete symbolic world model.

    Why it lasted

    The architecture helped establish behavior-based robotics and renewed attention to intelligence grounded in real-time perception and action.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Simple behaviors competed and combined without one world model.

  27. Record 27 · AI industry and fundingMarket and funding correction: 1987–1989

    The expert-system boom gives way to another winter

    What changed

    Brittle rule bases, high maintenance costs, cheaper general-purpose hardware, unmet expectations, and changing government priorities weakened the commercial AI market.

    Why it lasted

    The correction pushed work toward commodity computers, probabilistic reasoning, statistical methods, and narrower systems whose value could be measured more directly.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Deployment costs caught up with laboratory promises.

  28. Record 28 · Probabilistic reasoningResearch program: 1985–1988

    Bayesian networks make uncertainty an architecture

    What changed

    Pearl developed a framework in which directed graphs represented probabilistic dependencies and local computations updated beliefs as evidence changed.

    Why it lasted

    Bayesian networks gave AI a principled language for uncertain diagnosis, prediction, evidence combination, and conditional independence.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Evidence changed belief through a graph.

  29. Record 29 · Reinforcement learning and games

    TD-Gammon learns a strong game through self-play

    What changed

    Tesauro trained a neural network to evaluate backgammon positions by playing hundreds of thousands of games against itself and updating predictions through temporal differences.

    Why it lasted

    The program became an early, persuasive example of reinforcement learning, neural networks, and self-play producing high-level strategic play.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A game outcome trained the positions that led to it.

  30. Record 30 · Agent architecturesJune 1995

    A survey gives intelligent-agent research a common map

    What changed

    Wooldridge and Jennings organized intelligent-agent research around theories, architectures, and programming languages, with autonomy, social ability, reactivity, and initiative as recurring properties.

    Why it lasted

    The agent view treated an AI program as an actor situated in an environment, pursuing goals and sometimes coordinating with other actors rather than only returning an answer.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A program became an actor inside a changing environment.

  31. Record 31 · Computer chessMay 11, 1997

    Deep Blue defeats the world chess champion

    What changed

    Deep Blue won its six-game rematch against Garry Kasparov by combining parallel search, a detailed evaluation function, specialized chess hardware, databases, and expert preparation.

    Why it lasted

    The result showed how far a carefully engineered special-purpose system could go in a domain long treated as a public test of intelligence.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Search, hardware, data, and expert judgment became one machine.

  32. Record 32 · Probabilistic roboticsMay 1999

    Robots localize themselves with sampled beliefs

    What changed

    Monte Carlo Localization represented a robot's uncertain position with many sampled hypotheses and updated them as movement and sensor readings arrived.

    Why it lasted

    It helped make probabilistic reasoning practical for mobile robots whose sensors were noisy and whose location could not be known exactly.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Many possible locations competed until evidence concentrated belief.

  33. Record 33 · Autonomous vehiclesFirst race: March 13, 2004 · finishers: October 8, 2005

    The DARPA Grand Challenge turns failure into a finish

    What changed

    No vehicle finished DARPA's 2004 desert course. Eighteen months later, Stanford's Stanley won a 132-mile autonomous race and four other vehicles also completed it.

    Why it lasted

    The challenge forced perception, localization, planning, learning, and control to operate as one dependable real-time system.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A failed public test became a shared engineering deadline.

  34. Record 34 · Computer vision benchmarksJune 2009

    ImageNet makes a dataset into AI infrastructure

    What changed

    ImageNet organized millions of human-labeled images through WordNet concepts, giving computer vision a dataset and later a challenge at unprecedented scale.

    Why it lasted

    It made data construction, annotation labor, shared categories, and public measurement central infrastructure for progress in visual AI.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A taxonomy and millions of labels became a test field.

  35. Record 35 · Question answeringFebruary 14–16, 2011

    Watson answers Jeopardy clues at television speed

    What changed

    Watson defeated two leading Jeopardy champions by analyzing each clue, generating candidate answers, gathering evidence, estimating confidence, and responding under time pressure.

    Why it lasted

    The project demonstrated how many specialized language, retrieval, reasoning, and systems techniques could be assembled into one measurable question-answering machine.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Many candidate answers competed through scored evidence.

  36. Record 36 · Deep visual recognitionImageNet result: October 2012

    AlexNet changes the terms of computer vision

    What changed

    The SuperVision entry won the 2012 ImageNet classification challenge by a wide margin with a deep convolutional network trained on graphics processors.

    Why it lasted

    The visible benchmark result persuaded much of computer vision that learned representations, large labeled datasets, and accelerator hardware could beat hand-engineered feature pipelines.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Data, compute, and depth displaced a feature pipeline.

  37. Record 37 · Deep reinforcement learningDecember 19, 2013

    DQN learns Atari control from pixels and reward

    What changed

    DQN combined convolutional perception, Q-learning, and experience replay to learn game control directly from screen pixels and score changes.

    Why it lasted

    The result joined learned perception with sequential action and helped restart broad interest in deep reinforcement learning.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Pixels entered a value function, then returned as action.

  38. Record 38 · Generative modelingJune 10, 2014

    Adversarial training creates a new route to generation

    What changed

    Generative adversarial networks trained a generator against a discriminator in a coupled game, so each model changed the learning problem faced by the other.

    Why it lasted

    GANs opened a major route to learned image synthesis and made generative modeling a central branch of modern AI research.

    The lineage

    One network learned by trying to fool another.

  39. Record 39 · Game-playing systemsMatch completed: March 15, 2016

    AlphaGo joins learning with tree search

    What changed

    AlphaGo won four of five games against Lee Sedol by combining policy and value networks, reinforcement learning, and Monte Carlo tree search.

    Why it lasted

    The system showed how learned judgment and explicit search could work together in a decision space long considered beyond brute-force game programs.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Learned evaluation guided a branching search.

  40. Record 40 · Computational game theoryCompetition ended: January 30 · result announced: January 31, 2017

    Libratus wins a game with hidden information

    What changed

    Libratus finished a 120,000-hand heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em contest ahead of four professional players by computing strategies, solving subgames during play, and repairing weaknesses.

    Why it lasted

    Poker forced an AI system to reason about hidden information, strategic deception, and an opponent whose private state could not be observed.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A strategy had to remain strong without seeing the whole state.

  41. Record 41 · Language-model architectureJune 12, 2017

    The Transformer reorganizes sequence processing around attention

    What changed

    The Transformer processed sequences through attention and feed-forward layers without recurrent or convolutional sequence layers, first demonstrating the design on machine translation.

    Why it lasted

    Its parallel training and flexible context mixing made much larger language models practical and later supported vision, audio, multimodal, and scientific systems.

    The lineage

    Every token could route information directly to other tokens.

  42. Record 42 · Language representationOctober 11, 2018

    BERT standardizes fine-tuning one encoder across language tasks

    What changed

    BERT pretrained a bidirectional Transformer encoder on unlabeled text, then adapted that representation to many language tasks with small task-specific output layers.

    Why it lasted

    Pretrained language representations became a standard starting point for search, classification, extraction, question answering, and other applied AI systems.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    One pretrained representation served many language tasks.

  43. Record 43 · Language models and release governanceInitial release: February 14 · full release: November 5

    GPT-2 makes model release part of the research question

    What changed

    OpenAI announced GPT-2 but initially released only a smaller model, then published progressively larger weights while studying misuse, replication, detection, and stakeholder response.

    Why it lasted

    Model access, misuse evaluation, documentation, and release strategy entered mainstream AI research as questions in their own right.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A model release became a staged public experiment.

  44. Record 44 · Large language modelsMay 28, 2020

    GPT-3 turns the prompt into a task interface

    What changed

    GPT-3 used a 175-billion-parameter autoregressive model to attempt translation, question answering, classification, writing, and other tasks from instructions or examples placed in its context.

    Why it lasted

    Prompting became a general way to operate one pretrained system across many tasks without training a new set of weights for each one.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Examples in context became temporary task instructions.

  45. Record 45 · Scientific AICASP14 result: November 30, 2020 · paper: July 2021

    AlphaFold2 makes AI a practical instrument for structure prediction

    What changed

    At the CASP14 blind assessment, AlphaFold2 produced highly accurate protein-structure predictions across difficult targets, followed by a detailed peer-reviewed system account.

    Why it lasted

    The result established an AI system as a serious scientific tool and soon made large numbers of predicted structures available to researchers.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Sequence and evolutionary evidence became a predicted structure.

  46. Record 46 · Vision-language modelsJanuary 5, 2021

    CLIP gives visual recognition a language interface

    What changed

    CLIP learned a shared representation from 400 million image-text pairs and used natural-language labels to transfer across many visual recognition tasks.

    Why it lasted

    Language became a flexible interface for visual classification, and the shared representation became useful inside later multimodal and image-generation systems.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Images and descriptions met in one learned space.

  47. Record 47 · Generative image systemsPreprint: December 2021 · CVPR: June 2022

    Latent diffusion makes high-resolution generation practical

    What changed

    Latent diffusion moved the diffusion process into a compressed learned representation and used cross-attention to condition generation on text and other inputs.

    Why it lasted

    The approach reduced the computational burden of high-resolution synthesis and helped make text-guided image generation broadly deployable.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Generation moved into a smaller space, then returned as an image.

  48. Record 48 · Language-model agentsPreprint: October 6, 2022 · ICLR: 2023

    ReAct interleaves language reasoning with external action

    What changed

    ReAct prompted language models to alternate between written reasoning traces and actions such as consulting a knowledge source or interacting with a task environment.

    Why it lasted

    It supplied a clear pattern for tool-using language-model agents and tied claims about reasoning to actions that changed or inspected an external state.

    The lineage

    A thought selected a tool, and the result changed the next thought.

  49. Record 49 · Conversational AI deploymentNovember 30, 2022

    ChatGPT puts an instruction-following model into dialogue

    What changed

    OpenAI released ChatGPT as a free research preview with a dialogue interface, instruction-following behavior, and a feedback channel for strengths, failures, and unsafe outputs.

    Why it lasted

    Large language models moved from papers and developer tools into a direct, iterative interface that millions of people could test in ordinary work.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    A model became a public conversation and feedback loop.

  50. Record 50 · AI law and governanceEntered into force: August 1, 2024

    The European Union puts AI under a comprehensive law

    What changed

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 created a risk-based legal framework covering prohibited practices, high-risk systems, transparency, governance, enforcement, and general-purpose AI models.

    Why it lasted

    AI development and deployment became tied to a broad statutory regime whose requirements reach across providers, deployers, importers, and public authorities.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Technical risk categories became legal duties.

  51. Record 51 · Reasoning modelsSeptember 12, 2024

    o1 makes inference-time computation a visible scaling axis

    What changed

    OpenAI released o1-preview, a model trained with reinforcement learning to spend additional computation on multi-step work before returning an answer.

    Why it lasted

    Capability was presented not only as a consequence of larger pretraining, but also as a function of post-training and computation spent while solving a problem.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    More computation moved from pretraining into the act of answering.

  52. Record 52 · Open-weight reasoning modelsModel release: January 20 · technical report: January 22, 2025

    DeepSeek-R1 releases an open-weight reasoning-model family

    What changed

    DeepSeek published the R1 technical report, model repository, R1 and R1-Zero weights, and several distilled models focused on mathematics, code, and multi-step reasoning.

    Why it lasted

    A competitive reasoning-model family became downloadable and reusable beyond a small group of proprietary providers, drawing attention to reinforcement learning and distillation.

    People behind the record
    The lineage

    Reasoning behavior, weights, and training stages entered the public record.

Research method

How this archive is built.

A record is included when it materially changed the history of artificial intelligence and the claim can be traced to a reliable source. The timeline separates the original contribution from interpretations that appeared later.

  • Primary evidence firstOriginal papers, books, standards, archives, and official technical records anchor each milestone.
  • People named by roleContributors are linked to public profiles and described by the work they performed, not by a vague credit line.
  • Disputes stay visibleCompeting claims, retrospective labels, and uncertain dates are identified instead of being flattened into one story.
  • Corrections are welcomeReaders can inspect every cited source and report a factual issue through the public corrections process.

Research library

The evidence behind the claims.

94 links to original papers, books, proposals, technical reports, system documentation, official releases, institutional archives, and legal texts. Each source is labeled by type and year. Contemporary evidence stays separate from later historical interpretation.

  1. 01
    A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (opens in a new tab)Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics / Springer · source 01.1
  2. 02
    Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (opens in a new tab)The Technology Press · source 02.1
  3. 03
    Programming a Computer for Playing Chess (opens in a new tab)Philosophical Magazine · source 03.1
  4. 04
    Computing Machinery and Intelligence (opens in a new tab)Mind / Oxford Academic · source 04.1
  5. 05
    A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence (opens in a new tab)Stanford archive of John McCarthy's papers · source 05.1
  6. 06
    The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference (opens in a new tab)AI Magazine / AAAI · source 05.2
  7. 07
    The Logic Theory Machine: A Complex Information Processing System (opens in a new tab)IRE Transactions on Information Theory · source 06.1
  8. 08
    Allen Newell Logic Theory Machine research-paper record (opens in a new tab)Carnegie Mellon University Archives · source 06.2
  9. 09
  10. 10
    History of Lisp (opens in a new tab)Stanford archive of John McCarthy's papers · source 07.2
  11. 11
    Programs with Common Sense (opens in a new tab)Mechanisation of Thought Processes proceedings / Stanford · source 08.1
  12. 12
    Report on a General Problem-Solving Program (opens in a new tab)IFIP Congress / Carnegie Mellon University Archives · source 09.1
  13. 13
    Report on a General Problem-Solving Program (opens in a new tab)DBLP bibliographic record · source 09.2
  14. 14
    International Federation of Robotics: Robot History (opens in a new tab)International Federation of Robotics · source 10.1
  15. 15
    US Patent 2,988,237: Programmed Article Transfer (opens in a new tab)Google Patents / United States Patent Office · source 10.2
  16. 16
    On Generality and Problem Solving: A Case Study Using the DENDRAL Program (opens in a new tab)Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project / NASA Technical Reports Server · source 11.1
  17. 17
    Edward A. Feigenbaum Collection: Publications (opens in a new tab)Stanford University · source 11.2
  18. 18
    A Machine-Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle (opens in a new tab)Journal of the ACM · source 12.1
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Language and Machines: Computers in Translation and Linguistics (opens in a new tab)National Academy of Sciences · source 14.1
  21. 21
    Language and Machines: Full archival report (opens in a new tab)National Academies Press · source 14.2
  22. 22
    Shakey the Robot (opens in a new tab)SRI International · source 15.1
  23. 23
    The SRI Artificial Intelligence Center: A Brief History (opens in a new tab)SRI International · source 15.2
  24. 24
    A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths (opens in a new tab)IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics · source 16.1
  25. 25
    Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language (opens in a new tab)MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · source 17.1
  26. 26
    Thinking Machines: Can There Be? Are We? (opens in a new tab)Terry Winograd / Stanford University · source 17.2
  27. 27
    STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving (opens in a new tab)Artificial Intelligence / Elsevier · source 18.1
  28. 28
    Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN (opens in a new tab)Elsevier · source 19.1
  29. 29
    Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments (opens in a new tab)Stanford Heuristic Programming Project · source 19.2
  30. 30
    The Birth of Prolog (opens in a new tab)History of Programming Languages · source 20.1
  31. 31
    Prolog Historical Sources Archive (opens in a new tab)Computer History Museum · source 20.2
  32. 32
    Artificial Intelligence: A General Survey (opens in a new tab)Science Research Council archival edition · source 21.1
  33. 33
    Lighthill Controversy Debate at the Royal Institution (opens in a new tab)University of Edinburgh AIAI archive · source 21.2
  34. 34
    A Framework for Representing Knowledge (opens in a new tab)MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · source 22.1
  35. 35
    R1: An Expert in the Computer Systems Domain (opens in a new tab)First AAAI Conference / AAAI archive · source 23.1
  36. 36
    R1: A Rule-Based Configurer of Computer Systems (opens in a new tab)Artificial Intelligence / Elsevier · source 23.2
  37. 37
    Start of the Fifth Generation Computer Project (opens in a new tab)Information Processing Society of Japan Computer Museum · source 24.1
  38. 38
    Overview of the Ten Years of the FGCS Project (opens in a new tab)Institute for New Generation Computer Technology · source 24.2
  39. 39
  40. 40
    A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot (opens in a new tab)IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation · source 26.1
  41. 41
    Rodney Brooks Publications and AI Lab Memoranda (opens in a new tab)MIT CSAIL · source 26.2
  42. 42
    AI in the UK: Ready, Willing and Able? Historical review (opens in a new tab)UK House of Lords Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence · source 27.1
  43. 43
    Expert Systems and AI Hardware Industry Wall (opens in a new tab)Computer History Museum · source 27.2
  44. 44
    Bayesian Networks: A Model of Self-Activated Memory for Evidential Reasoning (opens in a new tab)UCLA eScholarship / Cognitive Science Society · source 28.1
  45. 45
    Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (opens in a new tab)Morgan Kaufmann / Elsevier · source 28.2
  46. 46
    Practical Issues in Temporal Difference Learning (opens in a new tab)IBM Research · source 29.1
  47. 47
    The Games That Helped AI Evolve (opens in a new tab)IBM History · source 29.2
  48. 48
    Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice (opens in a new tab)The Knowledge Engineering Review / Cambridge University Press · source 30.1
  49. 49
    Intelligent Agents: ECAI-94 Workshop Proceedings (opens in a new tab)Springer · source 30.2
  50. 50
    Deep Blue (opens in a new tab)IBM Research · source 31.1
  51. 51
    Deep Blue (opens in a new tab)IBM History · source 31.2
  52. 52
    Monte Carlo Localization for Mobile Robots (opens in a new tab)IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · source 32.1
  53. 53
    Monte Carlo Localization for Mobile Robots (opens in a new tab)Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute · source 32.2
  54. 54
    DARPA Grand Challenge (opens in a new tab)Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · source 33.1
  55. 55
    Stanley: The Robot That Won the DARPA Grand Challenge (opens in a new tab)Stanford University · source 33.2
  56. 56
    ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database (opens in a new tab)IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · source 34.1
  57. 57
    ImageNet Update, September 17, 2019 (opens in a new tab)ImageNet project · source 34.2
  58. 58
    Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project (opens in a new tab)AI Magazine / AAAI · source 35.1
  59. 59
    Watson, Jeopardy! Champion (opens in a new tab)IBM History · source 35.2
  60. 60
    ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (opens in a new tab)Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · source 36.1
  61. 61
    ILSVRC 2012 (opens in a new tab)ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge · source 36.2
  62. 62
    Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning (opens in a new tab)DeepMind / arXiv · source 37.1
  63. 63
  64. 64
    Generative Adversarial Nets (opens in a new tab)Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · source 38.1
  65. 65
    Generative Adversarial Networks (opens in a new tab)arXiv · source 38.2
  66. 66
  67. 67
    AlphaGo's Ultimate Challenge (opens in a new tab)Google · source 39.2
  68. 68
  69. 69
    Carnegie Mellon Artificial Intelligence Beats Top Poker Pros (opens in a new tab)Carnegie Mellon University · source 40.2
  70. 70
    Attention Is All You Need (opens in a new tab)Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · source 41.1
  71. 71
    Attention Is All You Need (opens in a new tab)arXiv · source 41.2
  72. 72
  73. 73
    Open Sourcing BERT (opens in a new tab)Google Research · source 42.2
  74. 74
    Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 43.1
  75. 75
    Better Language Models and Their Implications (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 43.2
  76. 76
    GPT-2: 1.5B Release (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 43.3
  77. 77
    Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners (opens in a new tab)OpenAI / Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · source 44.1
  78. 78
    AlphaFold: A Solution to a 50-Year-Old Grand Challenge in Biology (opens in a new tab)Google DeepMind · source 45.1
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
    CLIP: Connecting Text and Images (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 46.2
  82. 82
    High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models (opens in a new tab)IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · source 47.1
  83. 83
  84. 84
    ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models (opens in a new tab)International Conference on Learning Representations · source 48.1
  85. 85
    ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models (opens in a new tab)Google Research · source 48.2
  86. 86
    Introducing ChatGPT (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 49.1
  87. 87
    Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback (opens in a new tab)OpenAI / Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems · source 49.2
  88. 88
    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act (opens in a new tab)Official Journal of the European Union / EUR-Lex · source 50.1
  89. 89
    AI Act Enters into Force (opens in a new tab)European Commission · source 50.2
  90. 90
    Learning to Reason with LLMs (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 51.1
  91. 91
    OpenAI o1 System Card (opens in a new tab)OpenAI · source 51.2
  92. 92
  93. 93
    DeepSeek-R1 Model Repository (opens in a new tab)DeepSeek-AI · source 52.2
  94. 94

Continue from the archive

Trace the learning branch, then build.

See how machine learning became one branch of the larger AI story, then study the models and agent systems that now dominate practice.